We've compiled a large number of support against reporters like Tracy McLaughlin, and the publishers who support them. On this page we will showcase the top ten best comments in regards to our petition, our rally, and our cause.
When we hit our goal of 100,000 signatures, the entire list will be printed and delivered to the Prime Minister & The Premier, along with each MPs & MPPs offices!
We invite you to leave your own comment on our online petition via this link
Patrick O'Dell - Greetings from Bible Hill, Nova Scotia (right outside Truro!)I've seen this in a few papers out here, and came across this on google while researching a project. I hope you can get something together there so we can use it here too!
Katrina Wilson - My grandmother sent me this link - she said she saw this happen to someone else and he never recovered. They have to be responsible and held accountable!!!!!!
Daniel Predie Jr. - I was personally affected by the "biased" reporting of Tracy McLaughlin. It is nice to see that individuals, who have been affected, and yet claim their innocence, in a, somewhat, Ontario court of competent jurisdiction, only to be found guilty, in the unscrupulous and biased reportings of Tracy McLaughlin, are standing up against the unscrupulous and biased reportings of Tracy McLaughlin. Tracy McLaughlin should be held accountable, both in her personal and corporate capacities, as a reporter. I do believe that Tracy McLaughlin is as much personally responsible for her unscrupulous and biased reporting as she is, as a reporter, in her corporate capacity. Tracy McLaughlin has acted outside of her scope of authority and not in the best interests of the corporation and she should be brought to justice. It will be up to a judge to determine as to what extent Tracy McLaughlin should be held accountable, both in her personal and corporate capacities. Good Luck!!!
William Pratt - Let's all hope that the press shows up on mass and makes it very clear what they think of her and her kind. Please send me the info of were to go. Looking forward to meeting you all!
Wendy Johnston - Well they really should not get away with it. I will round up the girls and we will come make some noise, it looks like a good cause. Good luck and send where we are to meet. BTW if you have the contact info for that poor guy in the stories she wrote I would like to write him.
DoingMyPart - I'll do my part by being at the rally and telling my friends. I just emailed 7 people!!!!!
Norm Patterson - I like this its a better idea then the protests going on on in Toronto. Yes count myself and my wife as coming. I do not see where we are to go so please send that info to me at the email that I have given. Goodluck and I sure hope you reach your goals.
Dave and Susan Watson - Free speech is important but we strongly believe that if it is abused we should do all we can to draw attention to it. We will attend and believe in your cause. Thank you for caring.
Debbie Thomson - If everyone would stop buying they would not be printing :)
ConcernedBarrieCitizen - I already unsubscribed from the examiner after reading some of the crazy stories. I can get all this online for free, why on earth would I be paying for it? At least online I get respectable news sources. I save enough each year for a treat for myself too!
Karen Wilson - Well no one should get away with that kind of thing...I will be there and I will bring others but you need to email where I am to go. Good luck with this should be fun:)
John B. - I am a Canadian in Burlington Ontario and I am furious about how incomplete and inflammatory her article is.
This article is written to draw the wrong kind of attention, and clearly lacks important elements you would otherwise find in an appropriate article.
1-Clearly the woman making this claim is a gold digging (add whatever you wish) out for a free ride and meal ticket. These claims should have been made from the start not years and years later.
2- She will not get any spousal support she's been used to her current lifestyle for many years and is still alive and well.
3- Canadian law states a child must be eligible for child support at the time of submission of application (and they were not at an eligible age), all of them are over the age of 16 and well past any need for child support they are all adults.
4- She is not entitled to back support at all she never made him aware of her claim for it until recently.
It infuriates me that pertinent elements of this article are missing, making Mr Reeves out to be a dead beat.
The Toronto sun is a whisper of what it once was, it is so thin now that often people take two papers out of the box because it is so thin.
The Toronto Sun is desperate to draw readers because their circulation is dwindling, so desperate they are now pedaling it free to school children in schools.
See for yourself
Feel free to use my email as an example of what Canadians think of this kind of trash tabloid garbage.